Universal Security and Human Rights Mandate

UNIVERSAL SECURITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS
             MANDATE
                                Certified English Text
       Original instrument deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations



                                     PREAMBLE
    The States Parties to this Mandate,
    Recognizing that the Geneva framework made strategic weapons countable,
inspectable, and legally accountable;
    Recognizing that the Korean crisis demonstrated that counted weapons are not
controlled weapons unless lawful command is physically impossible to steal;
    Recognizing that nuclear command, state custody, punishment, deadly force,
military intervention, self-defense, sovereign legitimacy, and democratic
succession are forms of state power that must answer to enforceable ethical limits;
    Affirming that sovereignty is not ownership of people, but responsibility for
them;
    Affirming that rights without enforcement are wishes, and force without rights
is empire;
    Determined that no captain, faction, president, premier, general, inherited
office, or rogue authority shall be able to command civilization-ending force
outside lawful control;
    Determined also that no State may claim a reserved right to torture, disappear,
starve, collectively punish, kill in custody, arbitrarily deprive, or hold people
outside law;
    Acknowledging that disarmament, where verified and lawful, shall not be
treated as demotion, and that power qualified by law is not power lost;
    Affirming that all States emerging from authoritarian rule must have a verified
path to full legitimacy, and that compliance must not become permanent
humiliation;
    Recognizing that immediate enforcement is required when atrocity is obvious,
physical, and imminent, while disputed or unclear facts require disciplined review;
    Have agreed as follows:

                                       Article I
                                       Definitions
   For purposes of this Mandate:
 1. Mandate means the Universal Security and Human Rights Mandate, including
    this instrument and its annexes.

2. Universal Law of Human Rights or ULHR means the rights floor set forth in
    Annex I.
3. Strategic Command Integrity Protocol means the nuclear command, custody,
    patrol-window, and launch-interlock regime set forth in Annex II.
4. Immediate Physical Enforcement Duty means the duty of certified Security
    Council members to act, individually or collectively, to stop clear, ongoing,
    and physically verifiable violations of the ULHR, and to support Council-
    authorized enforcement where facts are disputed or unclear.
5. Security Council means the reformed Security Council operating under the
    post-Geneva order.
6. Duty Council means the permanently staffed Security Council proxy body
    authorized to issue urgent findings, nuclear-release determinations,
    emergency enforcement findings, and operational-support authorizations
    under this Mandate.
7. ISAA means the International Strategic Arms Authority, operating under its
    expanded strategic-accountability mandate as the Security Council subsidiary
    responsible for strategic registry control, inspection, custody verification,
    launch-authentication systems, nuclear compliance, and technical reset
    authority.
8. Accountable platform means any nuclear-capable strategic platform registered
    under the Geneva framework or successor strategic-accountability regime.
9. Accountable missile means any missile, launch vehicle, or delivery system
    registered as nuclear-capable under the Geneva framework or successor
    strategic-accountability regime.
10. Launch authority means the lawful authority to release nuclear weapons from
    an accountable platform. Ownership, possession, custody, or national
    command of a platform is not launch authority.
11. Declared active patrol window means a Security Council / ISAA-recognized
    period during which an accountable strategic platform is lawfully eligible to
    stand nuclear-ready.
12. Secured venue means a location actually secured by lawful security forces
    through continuous, effective, and accountable protective measures. A
    jurisdiction, city, district, or building is not a secured venue merely because
    law enforcement exists generally within it.
13. Custody includes arrest, detention, imprisonment, transfer, interrogation,
    medical control, confinement, immigration holding, military holding,
    protected-person holding, and any other condition in which a person is
    physically controlled by state authority or state-backed authority.
14. Deadly force means force likely to cause death or grave bodily harm,
    including direct force, deliberate exposure, deprivation, abandonment, or
    denial of conditions necessary to survival.
15. Protected person means any person in custody, displaced by conflict,
    dependent on state-controlled life-support, confined by state action, or

otherwise unable to secure basic survival without permission or protection
   from a controlling authority.
16. Certified enforcement capacity means mission-specific capacity, verified
   under Annex III, to conduct lawful physical enforcement without becoming
   the abuse the Mandate exists to stop.

                                   Article II
                               Binding Character
1. This Mandate is binding upon all States Parties according to its terms.
2. The ULHR establishes a minimum lawful-rights floor. No State Party may fall
   below it by statute, emergency order, military decree, religious law, executive
   order, inherited authority, domestic custom, or claim of sovereign discretion.
3. No State Party may claim a core exception to torture, disappearance, collective
   punishment, starvation or deprivation as policy, killing in custody as
   punishment, arbitrary deprivation, unaccountable nuclear command, or
   sovereignty as ownership of persons.
4. A State Party may adopt higher protections than those set forth in this
   Mandate.
5. Nothing in this Mandate reduces lawful democratic self-government where
   that government operates within the ULHR.

                                  Article III
                            Relationship to Geneva
1. The Geneva Treaty and successor strategic-accountability instruments remain
   in force except where modified by this Mandate.
2. Geneva-compatible nuclear ownership remains possible.
3. Nuclear ownership is not nuclear command.
4. No accountable nuclear weapon may be launched unless the lawful release
   chain required by Annex II is satisfied.
5. No national override, emergency override, head-of-state override, command
   override, military override, or platform override exists within the compliant
   system.
6. Mutually assured destruction is replaced within the compliant system by
   mutual control.
7. Retaliatory nuclear release remains possible only after an actual nuclear
   detonation or otherwise confirmed nuclear strike against a Security Council
   member or under the narrow planetary-defense exception set forth in Annex
   II.
8. Launch on warning, speculative first use, coercive first use, and countervalue
   terror retaliation are prohibited.

Article IV
                        Universal Law of Human Rights
1. Annex I is incorporated into this Mandate and has binding force.
2. States Parties shall secure the ULHR within their territory, vessels, registered
    platforms, occupied zones, detention facilities, life-support systems,
    controlled habitats, and areas under effective state control.
3. States Parties shall not aid, assist, recognize, or knowingly facilitate another
    authority’s violation of the ULHR.
4. States Parties shall maintain laws, courts, records, custody systems, command
    systems, and enforcement mechanisms sufficient to make the ULHR real in
    practice.

                                    Article V
                          Strategic Command Integrity
1. Annex II is incorporated into this Mandate and has binding force.
2. ISAA shall install, inspect, certify, and reset launch-control consoles and
    missile-level permissive modules on all accountable nuclear platforms and
    accountable missiles.
3. No accountable platform outside a declared active patrol window may stand
    nuclear-ready.
4. No seized key, captured code, coerced crew, rogue order, domestic
    emergency, or factional control may create launch authority.
5. No accountable missile may accept a launch command unless unlocked
    through the lawful release chain set forth in Annex II.
6. Tampering with ISAA consoles, missile modules, ciphers, clocks, keys,
    biometric systems, or launch-permission pathways constitutes a material
    breach.

                                  Article VI
                             Security Council Duty
1. Security Council members accept an affirmative duty to uphold the ULHR,
    Strategic Command Integrity Protocol, and Immediate Physical Enforcement
    Duty.
2. No Security Council member may claim permanent enforcement incapacity as
    a basis to avoid all duties arising from Council membership.
3. Security Council status carries burden as well as rank.
4. A Security Council member may be certified for some mission categories and
    not others.
5. No Security Council member may be assigned beyond certified capacity
    except by voluntary acceptance and Council finding that the assignment is
    lawful, necessary, and sustainable.

6. No Security Council member may use certification standards to create
   permanent humiliation, discriminatory ranking, or strategic exclusion of
   compliant States.

                                Article VII
                     Immediate Physical Enforcement Duty
1. Annex III is incorporated into this Mandate and has binding force.
2. When a violation of the ULHR is clear, physically verifiable, ongoing, and
    immediately dangerous, certified Security Council members shall act
    immediately to stop it.
3. When facts are disputed, attribution is unclear, thresholds are uncertain, or
    enforcement could itself become abuse, the Duty Council shall issue an
    urgent finding before physical enforcement proceeds.
4. Delay is complicity where atrocity is obvious.
5. Procedure is protection where facts are incomplete.
6. Physical enforcement shall be limited to protection of persons, restoration of
    lawful custody, preservation of life-support, prevention of unlawful deadly
    force, prevention of strategic-command seizure, and stabilization necessary to
    prevent recurrence.
7. Physical enforcement shall not be used for conquest, punitive occupation,
    resource seizure, discretionary regime change, or ideological conversion.
8. Physical enforcement shall be published quickly, live if operationally possible,
    except where immediate publication would expose protected persons, lawful
    operators, or ongoing rescue operations to grave danger.

                                  Article VIII
                             No Core Reservations
1. No State Party may enter a reservation, declaration, understanding, condition,
   or domestic interpretive rule that preserves a claimed right to:
    (a) torture;
    (b) disappearance;
    (c) collective punishment;
    (d) starvation or deprivation as policy;
    (e) killing in custody as punishment;
    (f) arbitrary deprivation of life, liberty, home, or property;
    (g) unaccountable nuclear command;
    (h) seizure of nuclear launch authority by factional, inherited, military, or
        rogue authority;
    (i) sovereignty as ownership of human beings.
2. Reservations, declarations, understandings, or conditions may clarify domestic
   implementation only if they do not reduce the binding core of this Mandate.

Article IX
                         Compliance and Rehabilitation
1. A State emerging from authoritarian rule, civil conflict, unlawful custody
   systems, or prior strategic-command failure may regain full legitimacy
   through verified compliance.
2. Compliance shall be assessed through:
    (a) representative democratic practice;
    (b) civilian control of military and security forces;
    (c) transparent courts;
    (d) lawful custody records;
    (e) independent inspection;
    (f) ULHR implementation;
    (g) strategic-command compliance;
    (h) cooperation with enforcement and reporting duties;
    (i) verified abandonment of prohibited practices.
3. A compliance path that never opens is not a compliance path.
4. No State shall be held in permanent second-class status after verified
   compliance.
5. No State shall claim rehabilitation while retaining the tools of authoritarian
   survival.

                                   Article X
                       Reporting, Publication, and Review
1. States Parties shall report material violations of the ULHR, strategic-command
    integrity, custody integrity, life-support integrity, or enforcement obligations.
2. Physical enforcement shall be reported publicly as soon as operationally
    possible.
3. Where operational security or protected-person safety requires delay,
    classified initial reporting shall be made to the Duty Council, followed by a
    public summary as soon as disclosure no longer creates grave danger.
4. Every enforcement action shall receive review for:
     (a) threshold validity;
     (b) proportionality;
     (c) protection of civilians;
     (d) custody integrity;
     (e) evidence preservation;
     (f) mission creep;
     (g) compliance with certified capacity;
     (h) publication adequacy.
5. Review shall not be used to delay obvious life-saving action.

6. Urgency shall not be used to hide abuse.

                                  Article XI
                Instruments, Ratification, and Entry into Force
1. States may express consent to be bound by ratification, acceptance, approval,
    or accession according to domestic law.
2. Instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval, or accession shall be
    deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations unless a successor
    depositary is designated by the Security Council.
3. For Security Council members, domestic approval must precede formal
    Council ratification under the reformed order.
4. This Mandate enters into force upon:
    (a) approval by all Security Council members;
    (b) satisfaction of required domestic approval procedures by those members;
    (c) General Assembly approval under the applicable reformed Charter
        threshold;
    (d) deposit of required instruments.
    (e) Later accessions shall take effect upon deposit unless the Security Council
        finds unresolved material noncompliance.

                                  Article XII
                            Implementation Schedule
1. The Security Council shall establish an implementation schedule for Annex II
    within thirty days of entry into force.
2. ISAA shall prioritize installation of launch-control consoles and missile
    modules on all accountable platforms currently assigned to active strategic
    readiness.
3. No accountable platform may enter a declared active patrol window after the
    implementation deadline without certified ISAA interlocks.
4. Enforcement-capacity certification under Annex III shall begin immediately
    upon entry into force.
5. States Parties shall submit domestic implementation plans for Annex I within
    ninety days.
6. Custody systems, detention systems, criminal punishment systems, military
    rules of engagement, self-defense law, secured-venue standards, and life-
    support governance shall be brought into compliance according to schedules
    approved by the Council.

                                 Article XIII
                                 Interpretation

1. This Mandate shall be interpreted to preserve human dignity, lawful
   democratic government, strategic stability, and enforceable accountability.
2. Ambiguity shall not be interpreted to create a right to torture, disappear,
   starve, collectively punish, kill in custody, seize nuclear command, or evade
   lawful enforcement.
3. Where a State claims domestic law requires violation of this Mandate, the
   claim shall be treated as a notice of noncompliance, not a defense.
4. This Mandate does not abolish nations. It qualifies the lawful exercise of state
   power where that power reaches human dignity, custody, survival, deadly
   force, democratic legitimacy, military intervention, or civilization-ending
   weapons.

                                   ANNEX I
                         Universal Law of Human Rights
  The following rights floor is binding upon all States Parties:
1. Equal dignity and equal protection.
2. Freedom of and from religion.
3. Speech, assembly, association, and petition, subject only to narrow restrictions
    protecting life, life-support integrity, active military operational security, or
    the rights of others.
4. Freedom of movement, departure, migration, refuge, and return, subject only
    to narrow lawful restrictions.
5. Basic conditions of human survival and dignity: food, water, breathable air,
    shelter, sanitation, basic communications, healthcare, habitat, and life-
    support.
6. Lawful self-defense, including lawful ownership, possession, and carrying of
    defensive weapons where lawful security forces are not actually securing the
    place; reasonable restrictions permitted in secured venues.
7. Due process, counsel, fair public hearing, impartial tribunal, notice,
    confrontation, and prompt presentment.
8. Privilege against self-incrimination; bans on torture, disappearance, collective
    punishment, cruel or degrading treatment, and arbitrary deprivation of life,
    liberty, home, or property.
9. Freedom from unlawful searches and seizures; probable-cause particularized
    warrants required.
10. Self-determination through representative democracy under law.
11. Lawful national succession by binding referendum if durable self-
    sufficiency, constitutional compliance, rights protections, and General
    Assembly approval are met.
12. Deadly force only to counter deadly force or probable imminent deadly force
    against oneself, another person, or society at large.

13. Deadly force, deprivation, or neglect may never be punishment for a person
    in custody or substitute for adjudication or sentence.

                                  ANNEX II
                      Strategic Command Integrity Protocol
Section 1 — Principle
 1. Nuclear ownership is not nuclear command.
 2. Possession of a platform, weapon, key, code, missile, warhead, crew,
     command post, or national office shall not by itself create launch authority.
 3. Lawful nuclear launch requires the complete release chain set forth in this
     Annex.
 4. No national override exists.
Section 2 — Lawful Release Chain
    A nuclear launch from an accountable platform is lawful only if all of the
following occur:
 1. The requesting State has suffered an actual nuclear detonation or otherwise
     confirmed nuclear strike, or the release falls within the planetary-defense
     exception.
 2. The national leader submits a launch request to the Security Council Duty
     Council.
 3. The Duty Council confirms that the strike satisfies the lawful-release standard.
 4. The proposed target package is primarily military or planetary-defense related
     and is not countervalue terror retaliation.
 5. The launch order is transmitted to an accountable platform inside a declared
     active patrol window.
 6. The operating captain and two observer captains receive the order.
 7. All three captains confirm that the order is valid.
 8. All three captains authenticate through the ISAA console.
 9. The ISAA console validates external authorization.
 10. The ISAA console generates missile-specific, time-specific launch ciphers.
 11. The selected missile modules accept valid ciphers.
 12. The missile modules unlock for the authorized window.
 13. Ordinary platform fire-control commands may then pass to the selected
     missiles during that window only.
Section 3 — Retaliation-Only Rule
 1. Nuclear release is prohibited unless an actual nuclear detonation or otherwise
     confirmed nuclear strike has occurred against a Security Council member.
 2. Launch on warning is prohibited.
 3. Speculative first use is prohibited.

4. Escalatory first use is prohibited.
 5. Demonstration use against cities or civilians is prohibited.
 6. Countervalue terror retaliation is prohibited.
 7. If the Duty Council cannot determine that an actual nuclear attack has
     occurred, the launch request shall be denied.
Section 4 — Planetary-Defense Exception
 1. Nuclear weapons may be authorized for planetary defense against non-state
     external existential threats, including astronomical impact threats or
     extraterrestrial threats.
 2. Planetary-defense release requires Security Council emergency authorization
     and ISAA verification.
 3. The exception shall not be used for interstate war, coercion, or strategic
     signaling.
Section 5 — Patrol-Window Rule
 1. ISAA shall maintain declared active patrol windows for accountable
     platforms.
 2. A platform outside its declared active patrol window shall not stand nuclear-
     ready.
 3. A platform outside its declared active patrol window shall not become launch-
     capable through possession of keys, codes, crews, or national orders.
 4. A State’s deterrent posture shall be maintained through certified fleet rotation,
     not by keeping every accountable platform launch-capable at all times.
Section 6 — ISAA Console
 1. ISAA shall install a tamper-resistant launch-control console aboard each
     accountable platform.
 2. The console is an authentication gateway.
 3. The console is not a fire-control computer.
 4. The console shall not select targets, steer missiles, navigate platforms, operate
     the vessel, or command launch by itself.
 5. The console shall determine only whether lawful release has been
     authenticated.
Section 7 — Missile-Level Permissive Modules
 1. ISAA shall install a sealed permissive module on each accountable missile.
 2. A module is a launch-permission gate.
 3. A module is not a guidance system.
 4. A module shall permit the missile to accept ordinary fire-control launch
     commands only after lawful release has been authenticated.
Section 8 — Four-Factor Authentication

The ISAA console shall generate missile-specific launch ciphers only after all
four required factors are satisfied:
 1. The operating captain and two observer captains insert and turn physical keys
     at stations separated by at least three meters.
 2. All three captains enter memorized authentication codes while their keys
     remain turned.
 3. All three captains pass biometric authentication, including iris scan.
 4. The console receives and validates the proper Security Council authorization
     code.
Section 9 — Observer Captains
 1. Every nuclear-ready strategic patrol shall carry two observer captains from
    certified compatible States other than the operating State.
 2. Observer captains shall be professionally certified for custody duty.
 3. Observer captains shall be approved under Security Council procedure.
 4. Observer assignment shall follow a compatibility matrix.
 5. Observer captains shall not be adversarial veto officers or allied rubber
    stamps.
 6. Each observer captain holds a real custodial veto.
Section 10 — Cipher Behavior
 1. Each launch cipher shall be missile-specific and time-specific.
 2. A cipher valid for one missile shall not validate on another missile.
 3. A cipher valid for one moment shall expire automatically within seconds.
 4. The console and missile modules shall use independent secure clocks.
 5. Clock drift beyond tolerance shall trigger safe mode.
 6. Repeated invalid time-window attempts shall trigger safe mode.
Section 11 — Launch Window
 1. Upon valid cipher acceptance, a missile module may unlock for a three-hour
    launch window.
 2. Unlock does not launch the missile.
 3. Unlock only permits that missile to accept ordinary fire-control launch
    commands during the authorized window.
 4. At expiration, the module shall relock automatically.
 5. A fresh lawful release sequence is required after relock.
Section 12 — Tamper Response
 1. Tamper detection shall include casing breach, forced access, unauthorized
     rewiring, bypass attempt, invalid maintenance access, clock manipulation,
     cryptographic intrusion, module removal, or console intrusion.
 2. Initial tamper response shall be denial, logging, and cryptographic zeroization.

3. Safe mode cannot be cleared aboard the platform.
 4. Restoration requires ISAA-controlled reset equipment and authorized ISAA
     technical personnel not carried aboard the platform.
Section 13 — Last-Resort Denial Charge
 1. Missile modules may contain a last-resort physical denial charge.
 2. The charge shall not activate for ordinary maintenance error, vibration, battle
    damage, transient anomaly, or single casing intrusion.
 3. The charge may activate only after sustained, invasive bypass activity
    consistent with an attempt to manually defeat the ISAA launch-permission
    pathway after safe mode and zeroization have occurred.
 4. The charge is designed to destroy the module and adjacent launch-enable
    interfaces.
 5. The doctrine accepts loss of missile, tube, platform, and crew if necessary
    because unauthorized nuclear launch is the greater civilizational danger.
Section 14 — Material Breach
   A material breach occurs if any State, commander, crew, faction, agency, or
official:
 1. deploys an accountable platform outside declared status;
 2. seizes or compromises observer keys;
 3. prevents observer embarkation;
 4. coerces a strategic crew;
 5. tampers with ISAA consoles or missile modules;
 6. attempts unauthorized launch;
 7. defeats patrol-window restrictions;
 8. falsifies ISAA registry or custody records;
 9. denies emergency containment orders;
 10. obstructs ISAA inspection.

                                   ANNEX III
                      Immediate Physical Enforcement Duty
Section 1 — Principle
 1. Rights are not real unless someone can physically protect the person who
     needs them.
 2. Security Council members accept an affirmative duty to provide immediate
     physical enforcement of the ULHR where required.
 3. Enforcement is a burden of rank.
 4. No Council member may claim authority to judge legitimacy while
     permanently refusing all burdens of enforcement.

Section 2 — Automatic Enforcement
   Certified Security Council members shall act immediately where a violation is:
 1. clear;
 2. physically verifiable;
 3. ongoing;
 4. immediately dangerous;
 5. likely to cause death, grave harm, disappearance, mass deprivation, unlawful
     custody killing, or irreversible life-support failure if not stopped.
   Examples include:
 1. civilians lined up before a firing line over a mass grave;
 2. ongoing mass execution;
 3. active death-camp operation;
 4. deliberate starvation corridor denial;
 5. life-support cutoff in a controlled habitat;
 6. seizure of nuclear command systems;
 7. custody killing in progress;
 8. armed destruction of lawful democratic succession;
 9. mass disappearance operation physically verified.
Section 3 — Duty Council Review
   Duty Council review is required where:
 1. facts are disputed;
 2. attribution is unclear;
 3. thresholds are uncertain;
 4. evidence is incomplete;
 5. action may be misused;
 6. the alleged violation consists of reporting irregularity, information
     suppression, legal dispute, electoral ambiguity, or indirect deprivation not yet
     physically verified;
 7. enforcement may create greater immediate harm than delay.
   Bad reporting requires careful deliberation before action is taken, because it
can.
Section 4 — Authorized Enforcement Measures
   Enforcement measures may include:
 1. warning;
 2. protected-person extraction;
 3. humanitarian corridor opening;
 4. precision strike;

5. air interdiction;
 6. maritime interdiction;
 7. seizure of command nodes;
 8. protection of detention facilities;
 9. custody transfer;
 10. medical evacuation;
 11. restoration of water, air, food, shelter, habitat, or life-support;
 12. communications restoration;
 13. evidence preservation;
 14. arrest of identified unlawful actors;
 15. stabilization of lawful authority;
 16. nuclear custody operations;
 17. temporary protective occupation only where strictly necessary to protect
     persons and subject to Council review.
Section 5 — Prohibited Enforcement Purposes
   Enforcement shall not be used for:
 1. conquest;
 2. territorial annexation;
 3. resource seizure;
 4. punitive occupation;
 5. discretionary regime change;
 6. ideological conversion;
 7. commercial advantage;
 8. collective punishment;
 9. demographic engineering;
 10. religious coercion;
 11. retaliation against civilian populations.
Section 6 — Certification
 1. No State may self-certify enforcement capacity.
 2. Certification shall be objective, mission-specific, renewable, and inspected.
 3. Certification categories may include:
     (a) airlift;
     (b) medical support;
     (c) evacuation;
     (d) translation;
     (e) detention operations;
     (f) legal observation;

(g) evidence custody;
     (h) perimeter security;
     (i) precision fires;
     (j) maritime interdiction;
     (k) nuclear custody;
     (l) infrastructure restoration;
     (m) command coordination;
     (n) civil-affairs stabilization;
     (o) life-support restoration.
 4. A State may be certified in one category and not another.
 5. No single status of “enforcement capable” shall exist.
 6. Certification does not measure prestige. It measures lawful assignment.
Section 7 — Assignment Limits
 1. No State shall be assigned beyond certified capacity.
 2. No State shall be required to perform a mission category for which it is not
    certified.
 3. A State may voluntarily accept additional duty only if the Council finds the
    duty lawful, necessary, and sustainable.
 4. No State may avoid all certification while retaining full Council enforcement
    standing.
Section 8 — Publication
 1. Physical enforcement shall be published quickly.
 2. Physical enforcement shall be livestreamed or otherwise made live to the
     public where operationally possible.
 3. Publication may be delayed only where immediate disclosure would create
     grave danger to protected persons, lawful operators, or ongoing rescue
     operations.
 4. Classified initial reporting shall be followed by public summary.
 5. Public reporting shall include legal basis, threshold finding, enforcing States,
     mission category, known casualties, custody actions, and review schedule.
Section 9 — Custody During Enforcement
 1. Persons detained during enforcement become protected persons.
 2. They shall receive:
     (a) identification;
     (b) time stamp;
     (c) location record;
     (d) medical screening;
     (e) notice of status;

(f) counsel access where applicable;
     (g) protection from public humiliation;
     (h) chain-of-custody record;
     (i) prompt review.
 3. Enforcement forces shall not torture, disappear, collectively punish, or kill
    detainees as punishment.
 4. Evidence custody shall be preserved.
Section 10 — Review
 1. Every enforcement action shall be reviewed.
 2. Review shall determine:
     (a) whether the threshold was met;
     (b) whether force was proportional;
     (c) whether civilians were protected;
     (d) whether custody was lawful;
     (e) whether evidence was preserved;
     (f) whether publication was adequate;
     (g) whether mission creep occurred;
     (h) whether further action is required.
 3. Review shall not become punishment for lawful urgent action.
 4. Review shall not become concealment for unlawful action.
Section 11 — Termination of Enforcement
 1. Enforcement shall terminate when protected persons are secured, immediate
    violation has ceased, lawful custody has been restored, and recurrence risk
    has been reduced to a level manageable by lawful local authority or Council-
    supervised mechanism.
 2. Continued presence requires renewed Council finding.
 3. Temporary protective occupation shall be exceptional, narrow, reviewed, and
    publicly justified.

                               FINAL CLAUSES
    This Mandate binds power to ethics.
    It does not make the world good.
    It makes future abuse harder to hide, harder to excuse, and harder to preserve
as lawful power.

                 AUTHENTIC TEXTS AND DEPOSITARY
 The Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Hindi, Korean, Russian, and Spanish texts
   of this Mandate are equally authentic.
 The original of this Mandate shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the
   United Nations, who shall transmit certified copies to all States Parties.

In witness whereof, the undersigned, being duly authorized by their respective
Governments, have signed this Mandate.
    DONE at New York this fifteenth day of October, two thousand thirty-seven,
in a single original in the languages specified above, each text being equally
authentic.

                     DEPOSITARY CERTIFICATION
   I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the English authentic text of the
Universal Security and Human Rights Mandate, adopted at New York on 15
October 2037 and deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

   For the Secretary-General of the United Nations, as depositary:

   Treaty Section, Office of Legal Affairs
   New York, 15 October 2037

    STATUS OF RATIFICATION AND ENTRY INTO FORCE
   The Secretary-General records that the instruments required under Article XI
were deposited following completion of the required domestic approval
procedures by the Security Council members; that the required General Assembly
approval was recorded; and that the Mandate entered into force on 15 October
2037.

   States having completed the required procedures as of entry into force:
   United States of America
   United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
   French Republic
   Russian Republic
   People’s Republic of China
   Korean Empire
   Republic of India
   Islamic Republic of Pakistan

   Certified copies were transmitted to all States Parties and to States entitled to
become parties to the Mandate.